The Necessity of Hadith
The Necessity of Hadith (25020)
And The Disconnect Between The Qur'an-Only Approach And The Qur'anic Text
Imagine a religion in which its adherents openly reject every saying, action, and event surrounding their Prophet &$. It is a Qur'anist's reality. What exactly would lead to this stance, this scepticism, towards haduh? What would cause a Muslim to reject the teachings of the Prophet ¿E that he adores?! Everything about Islam is questionable without hadiths. What exactly do we know about the Prophet of Islam 2 without hadiths? Never mind his biography, we can't even ascertain his identity. The Qur'än only identifies him as Muhammad (Q. 3:144). Couldn't this be referring to Muhammad bin Maslama d. 43 AH) instead of Muhammad bin 'Abdilläh (d. 11 AH)? This book is directed to hadith-rejecters, to Muslims in general that are on the fence, as well as to conservative Muslims that seek to reaffirm their stance in regards to the authority of hadiths.
The Necessity of Hadith (25020)
And The Disconnect Between The Qur'an-Only Approach And The Qur'anic Text
Imagine a religion in which its adherents openly reject every saying, action, and event surrounding their Prophet &$. It is a Qur'anist's reality. What exactly would lead to this stance, this scepticism, towards haduh? What would cause a Muslim to reject the teachings of the Prophet ¿E that he adores?! Everything about Islam is questionable without hadiths. What exactly do we know about the Prophet of Islam 2 without hadiths? Never mind his biography, we can't even ascertain his identity. The Qur'än only identifies him as Muhammad (Q. 3:144). Couldn't this be referring to Muhammad bin Maslama d. 43 AH) instead of Muhammad bin 'Abdilläh (d. 11 AH)? This book is directed to hadith-rejecters, to Muslims in general that are on the fence, as well as to conservative Muslims that seek to reaffirm their stance in regards to the authority of hadiths.